Thursday, July 29, 2010

OECD battle over aid to Pangue dam in Chile

A Swedish-Norwegian aid financing package for the Pangue hydropower project in Chile violates OECD rules for aid disbursement because the project is commercially viable and could have been financed on market terms. (See DT 19/94)

The Nordic aid agencies circumvented the rules by using a Swedish notification of the project to OECD that was almost three years old. Sweden reported the project to OECD in January 1992 to avoid the new rules that took effect one month later.

In 1993, the Swedish Trade Ministry proposed that the project be “no aid common line”; that is, accepted by all OECD members as being ineligible for aid financing. Most countries agreed. Canada argued that since Pangue was a private sector initiative with no public sector ownership or financial guarantees, “the use of conessional credits for this project [is] inappropriate”.

But Spain refused, and the proposal was dropped. The Kværner/GE Canada/AEG consortium won the tender, and Swedish and Norwegian concessional loans financed the contract with a grant element of SEK 100 million.